Judge rejects environmental groups’ lawsuit on San Benito solar project

Handing a victory to traders wishing to construct among the world’s biggest photo voltaic farms, a San Benito County judge has declined a legitimate challenge by environment groups who the project would harm wildlife.

Inside a nine-page ruling, Superior Court Judge Robert O’Farrell stated that people from the San Benito County board of administrators didn’t violate condition law this past year once they approved the $1.8 billion proposal to place as much as 4 million solar power panels in Panoche Valley, an arid expanse of rangeland about 50 miles southeast of Hollister.

“What we are attempting to do is help the atmosphere and lower California’s reliance upon dirty non-renewable fuels,” stated John Pimentel, leader of PV2 Energy, a company with offices in Menlo Park and Bay Area. “We’d have a much common support in the environment community due to the advantageous impact for quality of air and security.”

However the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, the Sierra Club and several local citizens referred to as Save Panoche Valley prosecuted to bar the project, declaring the 399-megawatt project that might be built over the roughly 3,200 acres west of Interstate 5 would disrupt the rural character from the area and harm the endangered San Joaquin Package Fox, blunt-nosed leopard lizard and giant kangaroo rat.

The judge switched back the groups’ arguments, stating that the county administrators correctly adopted the California Environment Quality Act and also the Williamson

Act, particularly because the designers decided to buy 23,000 adjacent acres and put them in permanent conservation easements.

Pimentel stated his company hopes to interrupt ground by 2013 or 2014, and also the project’s competitors stated Thursday they haven’t made the decision whether or not to appeal.

“We’re very disappointed,” stated Shani Kleinhaus, an advocate using the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, located in Cupertino. “We believe the environment harm is going to be substantial.”

Federal judge throws out Obama drilling rules


U.S. District Judge Nancy Freudenthal ruled in support of a oil industry group, the Western Energy Alliance, in the suit against the us government, including Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.

The ruling maintains Rose bush-era expedited gas and oil drilling under provisions known as categorical exclusions on federal lands countrywide, Freudenthal stated.

The federal government contended that gas and oil companies had no situation simply because they did not show the way the new rules, implemented through the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service this past year, had produced delays and put into the price of drilling.

Freudenthal declined that argument.

“Western Energy has shown through its people identifiable injuries,” she stated. “Individuals injuries are based on the administrative record.”

A lawyer for that government rejected to comment but Kathleen Sgamma, director of government and public matters for that Colorado-based Western Energy Alliance, recognized the ruling.

“She completely reduced the government’s argument the harm was speculative,” Sgamma stated from the judge.

The Power Policy Act of 2005 enables the BLM and Forest Plan to invoke categorical exclusions and skip new environment review for drilling permits under certain conditions.

The conditions include instances where companies intend to disturb relatively little ground and environment review already continues to be accomplished for that area. A categorical exclusion is also invoked when additional drilling is planned in a well pad where drilling has happened inside the previous 5 years.

Categorical exclusions were broadly used through the West – particularly in the gas boom states of Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico – until this past year.

In Wyoming, the BLM invoked categorical exclusions for 87 percent from the new gas wells drilled within the Upper Eco-friendly River Basin between 2007 and 2010. Individuals drilling permits added up: Near to 3,000 over individuals 3 years within the basin’s Jonah Area and Pinedale Anticline gas fields.

The Jonah Area and Pinedale Anticline rated fifth and sixth for gas production within the U.S. last year.

Federal land agencies adopted new rules for interpretation the power Policy Act this past year in reaction for an environmentalist suit over using categorical exclusions. The Western Energy Alliance prosecuted within the new rules last fall.