Environmentally friendly products – a lifestyle that leaves minimal damage

[ad_1]

An ecological lifestyle has many advantages. A green approach to life or a lifestyle that leaves minimal harm to the environment is gaining ground as the damage caused by neglect becomes more and more apparent. With the existence of rapidly growing dead zones in the oceans, along with the mass extinction of corals, endangered species and forests, more and more people are concerned about buying green goods and changing their lifestyles to combat this problem.

However, there are a few things you need to keep in mind. Buying and using organic goods is just the beginning. With this energy demand, changing your way of life so that you don’t get as much electricity from the grids is a key element in helping the Earth become a sustainable planet for future generations. Energy-Star compliant appliances are just the beginning. Building sustainable homes or houses that do not cause long-term damage to the environment and are environmentally friendly is a brilliant way to tackle the problem. As many sustainable homes include eco-friendly solutions, such as large gardens that produce food for the whole family, it is an excellent substitute for a stereotypical home.

There are many eco-friendly products on the market, from bleach alternatives to organic hand soaps. When you want to decide how best to help the environment, you should make a list of the various products that you use frequently and find out which ones can be replaced with environmentally friendly ones. Don’t expect to save money in the beginning when you switch to eco-friendly goods. As long as the market for environmentally friendly products is not more expensive than heavy chemicals that harm the environment, these goods will not be more commercial than purchased in bulk. Being environmentally friendly often comes with higher costs as many environmentally friendly companies are also Fair Trade participants. Fair trade is more expensive because more money from production goes directly to workers in the Third World and developing countries.

While many organic products do not contain harsh substances and hazardous chemicals, they should be kept out of the reach of children and pets. Digesting these foods can cause health problems. After all, natural does not mean non-toxic. ecological is safe for the environment, not necessarily safe for you. That said, many organic foods will not cause permanent harm to humans or animals if accidentally ingested.

[ad_2]

Source by Richard P Mullins

Ipath shoes – the best eco skateboarding shoe

[ad_1]

Ipath shoes are eco-friendly skateboard shoes. The brand has a high level of environmental awareness. This is proven not only in their news program, which is geared towards the ecosystem, but also in the shoes themselves. The use of products such as hemp and natural cotton in Ipath shoes proves that the brand is committed to caring for the ecosystem. The brand name really stands out from other skateboard shoe brands thanks to this environmental awareness that is directly applied to shoes and sneakers.

The Ipath brand was created by Brian Kraus and professional skateboarder Matt Field. It is a skateboarding footwear and apparel company based in Torrance, California. Ipath shoes and sneakers come from the streets of San Francisco, but also from the back alleys of New York, where skateboarding dominates. The idea behind this shoe is to understand what awareness really is all about. For the company, this awareness means being yourself and following your own path. This can be summed up by the brand’s slogan: Follow your path.

It is actually going on a very clear route. Searching for themselves and going their own way, they have developed a down-to-earth collection of skateboard shoes and sneakers as opposed to the emerging skate shoe innovation that is currently hitting the market. Ipath shoes and sneakers are considered by many to be eco-friendly skateboard shoes. Never before have there been skateboarding shoes like Ipath shoes and sneakers on the market. As the skateboarding sector races to use the most innovative materials, Ipath shoes and sneakers use hemp, organic cotton and leather as an alternative.

However, the quality level of Ipath footwear cannot be undermined just because they are eco-friendly skateboard shoes and sneakers. These skate shoes use the highest quality hemp available on the market. They use the highest quality rubber for better grip. They also use EVA insoles for greater comfort and of course protection. The shoes are manufactured using a strobe construction that creates a sock-like effect for greater comfort and allows for better performance. Their shoes and sneakers really make excellent eco-friendly skateboarding shoes.

The Ipath men’s shoe range consists of the brands Alfaro, Brentford, Burnquest, Cats, Classics, Darius, Grasshopper, Gall, Derelict, Mantis, Lyndhurst, Langston, Sheerling, Reed, Passmore and Stash. Their designs make this earthly sense as the shoes are mostly made of the highest quality hemp and natural cotton. While some are made of leather, the manufacturer ensures that they only use leather from a silver-certified tannery. Ipath shoes and sneakers, like other brands of skateboard footwear, have a skateboarding crew that includes Fred Gall and Bob Burnquist.

[ad_2]

Source by Brock O’Connor

Does being green really make business sense?

[ad_1]

If you’re like me, the whole idea of ??being green evokes the image of meeting (remember them) 60’s hippies wearing sandals and holding posters that say Save The Planet. Well, maybe you’re not as dated as I am, but you should have my overall drift, the green transition is for far-left radicals who demand that everyone reduce their carbon footprint immediately. Mainly because climate change and global warming are major issues that everyone should address, or the planet is rapidly going to Hell – like, right now!

Perhaps this is an extreme view of ecology that barely resembles modern recycling, composting and energy conservation practices to reduce our environmental impact. The whole concept of greening has embraced an “individual” playing field in which each of us can reduce our dependence on our limited natural resources – many of which are not renewable. Each of us can use less, change driving habits, recycle more items and lower energy / electricity consumption. We can also plant more trees and / or support organizations that are trying to save the environment.

But what about companies or firms – how do they fit into this green image?

Just like an individual, companies may operate or implement certain procedures that reduce their environmental impact. . It doesn’t really need to be anything shocking (possibly a wrong word), but simple actions that can make a significant difference. I was totally shocked to read on a leading green guide website that roughly 50% (that’s half) of the trees harvested in North America are actually used to make paper. Imagine what all this logging is doing to wildlife habitat and / or deforestation.

Even more surprising was the fact that it would take one tree to produce around two cartons of writing / faxing paper, and if only 5% of companies opted to send faxes by email (paperless faxing), it would save over a million trees per year. Moreover, first of all, you need to consider the total environmental cost of producing this paper – it takes more than 1,000 different chemicals and countless kilowatt hours of energy to make paper.

To complicate matters further, realize that in the United States (and elsewhere), generating energy often means burning more carbon, which releases some nasty chemicals into the atmosphere, such as nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and carbon dioxide. . Producing more of these chemicals gives us more smog and acid rain. Ouch.

One way businesses, large and small, can help the environment is by “getting rid of paper” or creating a “paperless office” by relying on new technologies such as digital faxing and document archiving. Computers and email have really changed the workplace and have greatly reduced our dependence on paper. Records, files, messages, faxes … can now be stored electronically or digitally. This “paperless office” can be further enhanced with “cloud” services where all information is stored on remote third party servers.

We also offer Virtual PBX (Private Branch Exchange) services where most, if not all, of our business calls and communications can be handled via computers and the Internet. This includes Internet fax or e-mail, which can be completely electronic. Changing as little as getting rid of your old traditional fax can go a long way toward making any business greener.

However, the question still remains as to whether these green things are good for business. The answer must be a definitive yes. Forget about the environment for a moment, on a purely operational level, using less energy, paperless, using digital documentation … will make your business more efficient and cheaper to run. Saving money is always good for business. It’s the same with doing things in the most modern way possible – especially if your business relies on quick communication with employees, customers or customers.

Of course, we must not forget about the benefits of PR that flow from the transition to green education. Emphasizing this green label on your products and services will surely increase awareness and generate more business, especially among customers who now require a greener alternative to the many products / services they use or use. A lot of companies are jumping into green fashion for this very reason – it’s just good for business.

While this may be seen as a bit sneaky or even manipulative, if these companies can back their claims with green actions that really benefit the environment, ultimately their motives don’t really matter as we all win. Reducing our dependence on non-renewable resources and / or using less energy can only be seen as a good thing. A good thing for the environment. A good thing for business. Now where I put those blessed sandals.

[ad_2]

Source by Titus Hoskins

Education, meaning, purpose and function

[ad_1]

The process of defining the meaning of Education aims to problematize its lexicology and reconceptualize it. The example is illustrated from real everyday life. An international company that manufactures advanced pharmaceutical products is choosing a cheaper way to get rid of its waste, not to dispose of it. They dump waste off the shores of the poorer African continent based on the company’s maximum profit policy. Is the company’s management well educated? They are, as can be assumed, for rhetorical convenience. The illiterate indigenous tribe living in the jungle of Papua New Guinea’s rainforests do not know the meaning of the environmental jargon: “Reduce, Recycle and Reuse”; however, they protect and sustain the environment based on their known skill level. . Are the inhabitants of the rainforest uneducated just because they are illiterate?

The problems of narrow meaning we call Education arise in the contextuality of the examples above, and the conceptual difficulties of trying to focus meaning on Education are as complex as possible. So the importance of education must emerge from this narrowness to a broad meaning. In its broadest sense, Education is the process of “stimulating” a “person” with Experiences, Language and Ideology, starting from birth and continuing until death. This meaning of Education would give rise to the Purpose as the dissemination of formally, non-formal, cultural, national, scientific and ritually literal skills, literacy, knowledge, norms and values ??as a pedagogy of the institutions that gave rise to the purpose. This goal would be directly related to the consolidation of this Society as an ideological structure. The goal will redefine the function of education. The function of education will therefore be related to how meaning and goals are synchronized in processes called application experience. The formulation of the thesis of this article is developed on three levels – firstly, the meaning of education as stimulating a person with language, experiences and ideology, secondly, the goal of education is to disseminate and consolidate it, and thirdly, the function as synchronized processing.

The development of the sense of education as the stimulation of a person from birth to death with language, experiences and ideology makes the person a being of a process as an ontology. This process begins with being born as an affective language, such as a mother’s cooing, to the process by which the person becomes a cognitive structure as a self-speaking subject or an ego-subject. Here, the individual is subject to the norms, traditions of the culture of society and learns to adapt and assimilate the symbolic codes of society. Along with this process, the individual also learns to formalize his adaptation and belonging to the reading and writing process, ie developing skills and competences. Thus, we conclude that the meaning of education is multi-level and multi-directional, both through formalistic and informal social institutions. The formalistic institutions that promote the Meaning of Education are Schools, Government, Law and Order, etc. Other formalistic institutions, such as family, religion, and native traditions, can act both openly and silently to orient the individual in terms of experience, educated. For example, the oral transmission of a folk song by a mother to her daughter is silent, while the marital function is an aspect that is more open to the implementation of cultural pedagogy. In this way, language and experiences generate codes by which society can experience the Meaning of Education, making ideology possible.

In this way, the importance of Education would give rise to the Purpose as the dissemination of formal, informal, cultural, national, scientific and ritual skills, literacy, knowledge, norms and values ??as a pedagogy. Dissemination would mean disseminating the Society’s cultural norms and values. It would also mean spreading nationalism as democratic pluralism, multiculturalism, diversity and celebration or its reverse as intolerance, authoritarianism through pedagogy; it is also the development of systematized pedagogy – promoted as theoretical and applied in the scientific and technocratic institutions of the Society.

The goal of Education would be directly related to the consolidation of this Society as an ideological structure. Contemporary fixation would answer the questions related to the purpose of Education, which are: empowerment, durability, protection, minimization, conflict resolution, creativity and innovation.

The Purpose of Education and the Meaning of Education give rise to the Function of Education as meaning, i.e. the synchronized processing of Purpose and Function into a materialistic, operational process. Synchronization of the Meaning and Purpose of education takes place at different levels of action. They create, transmit and implement and simulate culture. At the level of Creation, the function of Education is related to “Policy Formation” related to the meaning and purpose of education. Policy formulation can involve many issues such as development, sustainable development, scientific progress, promoting rights, dignity and culture, energy management, disaster management, peace and conflict resolution. Once policy is made, they are communicated and implemented through the institutional structures of society, such as the legal system, education system, welfare management, etc. Cultural simulation takes place both formally and informally as social religious, cultural and family institutions. They fulfill many social and cultural roles in the home, and also celebrate or regret the occasion.

To sum up, it is necessary to summarize the thesis that the meaning of education has been extended to stimulate a person with the help of language, experiences and ideology. The importance of Education becomes essential to the Purpose of Education as dissemination and preservation. The meaning and purpose of education is synchronized with the function of education as creation, transmission and participation.

[ad_2]

Source by Anand Bose

Advantages of reusable sandwich bags over plastic bags

[ad_1]

Plastic is a very complex thing. It is also very apt that the adjective used to describe people with an aura of “false” as plastic. This is because plastic is essentially fake and man-made.

Plastic is a by-product of oil. Yes, it is the same oil that is used to clean the gasoline that powers our cars, planes and power plants. The same toxic, harmful substance that we all know comes from the same family as the substance we use to package food and drink!

However, unlike oil, which takes millions of years to form but little time to evaporate and spread, plastic takes both millions of years to form and millions of years to decompose. This is because plastic is what chemistry calls a polymer. A polymer is a long chain of molecules linked together and held together by incredibly strong bonds that are very difficult to break. That is why plastic is such a durable and versatile material.

While plastic has many uses, food packaging is one area where it is used too freely. In fact, studies linking heating food in plastic packaging to carcinogenicity have been carried out.

So, when our food is packed in a plastic bag, it comes into contact with the same materials that make gasoline and diesel fuel! Plastic is also full of nasty chemicals like BPA (Bisphenol-A) and phthalates (see glossary section) that have harmful long-term effects.

These harmful effects are just those that directly affect our body. The damage that plastic does to the environment is manifold. While most natural materials, such as food waste, paper, and the like, break down quickly (that is, they are easily digested by microbes and bacteria and broken down into smaller particles), plastic is virtually indigestible – pun intended! It is estimated that families in the United States alone throw away over 200 million tons of plastic waste every day! Plastic bags contribute a lot to this!

By using reusable sandwich bags (brands such as LunchSkins and EcoDitty are great examples) that are made of food-safe fabrics and cotton, our food not only comes into contact with safer, natural materials, as fabrics and cotton are grown naturally, and not chemically manufactured, but reusable sandwich bags are washable so they can be used repeatedly. They will be like new every time! They also won’t add non-biodegradable and non-degradable materials to our already clogged landfills.

[ad_2]

Source by Shabbir U Nooruddin

Recycling is not recycling

[ad_1]

In theory, everything is recyclable. I could give back the building, the plane, the DVD, the camera … and even the toothbrush. For something recyclable to actually be recycled, someone has to take it and turn it into something new. This is where the concept of recycling lies.

In 1988-89, I was one of those students who advocated recycling. But I imagined people who did whatever filled the landfills would buy back whatever they produced and turn it back into new. So when recycling started, for many years I thought it was happening. Then there was a nice little triangle underneath all sorts of containers and I thought, “Wow, we were really successful! Power for the people ”.

Then a few years ago, let’s say five, I realized that we weren’t as smart as we thought when we were all lobbying for recycling on behalf of our planet. We have never insisted that the companies that produce the things that end up in landfill should undertake to take back the waste they have generated. Instead, society has become a waste that needs to be dealt with. In some places the plastics industry contributes to a small part of the cost of operating recycling yards, in other sites the recycling yards receive funding through toll systems. To a large extent, recycling yards are largely dependent on the financing of their activities from our taxes. In very few places, producers of plastic, glass and polystyrene buy back what they put on the market. All waste that comes from the profits generated by their companies becomes a problem for society.

Recycling points are like purgatory, or if you prefer the Dr. Seuss reference: “the waiting room.”

We carefully select our approved ‘Recyclable Materials’ in our small communities to make sure we minimize what we send to landfill. We release blue boxes (or other colors) carefully, feeling content to join others in our work to save the planet. A gorgeous truck arrives and takes our stuff to a local recycling paradise where we believe angels work hard, magically turning everything we shipped in our blue boxes into something wonderful and new for our communities. Maybe the fairy godmother helps from time to time and waves the Bibbidi-Bobbidi-Boo magic wand and jovially shouts: “The food container will become aluminum foil! The bottles will become carpets. “

(OK, I know I’m mixing Cinderella, religion, and Dr. Seuss. I’m targeting mass appeal – kids, gen-x, elders.)

Now I like the fact that most people have a decent brain. It’s overloaded at times, but I like to think I’m pretty smart. One day I woke up and realized, “Hmm … I don’t think the things in the blue box go to heaven in my own community.” It was like waking up and doubting God’s existence. The mere thought that the things I had carefully put into my blue box hadn’t reappeared on the shelves in my neighborhood grocery store with fancy triangles shook the ground.

After a bit of research, I quickly discovered: something is only recycled when someone somewhere in the world wants to buy that product, and tons of it, from recycling warehouses, and then turn it into something else. Another sad truth: that when they found them, the “someone” was rarely in the same community where recycling took place. Sometimes they weren’t even in the same country!

So…..

You must be an experienced customer when a manufacturer says you should buy their product because it is recyclable or made from “recycled materials”. Before buying, call the manufacturer and ask where it is recycled; how much of the exact same product they buy back, and if not, who and where will buy it back to turn it into something; and finally, how much recycled material is in their product. Many products with “recycled content” have less than 20% recycled content. Their product still largely depends on the continuous extraction of crude oil in order to obtain its primary resources for the production of plastic.

Recycling is a great solution. I was for it all. Theoretically, it can minimize what we send to the landfill. However, after twenty years of practice in recycling, it is time for us to reassess how successfully the plastics industry has been successful in reducing waste against the gains it has made at the expense of our planet. The plastics and polystyrene industries have been profitable on the planet for over fifty years, with nearly twenty of them aiming to clean up their clutter through recycling efforts supported in many communities through public taxes.

Today, plastics are produced and exported in communities around the world where there is no luxury in the form of a tax base to offset recycling composition costs. It can no longer be said that littering is the problem. The problem is what we do, how we do it, what it’s made of and what we can do locally when we’re done with our stuff. This emperor needs new clothes.

[ad_2]

Source by Kathleen Boylan

The Destruction of the American Buffalo

[ad_1]

The bison or buffalo is believed to have originated in Eurasia and then crossed the Bering Strait land bridge that once connected the continents of Asia and North America. In prehistoric times, massive herds literally darkened the earth’s surface as they wandered and foraging. For many centuries, the buffaloes slowly migrated south until they inhabited most of the meadows of the United States. The seas of buffalo herds stretched across the horizon from Canada to Mexico and from the Pacific northwest coast of Oregon southeast to Florida.

The bison was the most numerous single species of large wild mammals on Earth and is the largest terrestrial mammal in North America since the end of the Ice Age. A male buffalo can be up to six feet tall and weigh up to 2,000 pounds.

Prior to the desecration of the American wilderness by the white man, Native Americans were dependent on buffaloes for food, clothing, and shelter. Indian culture had respect and respect for the buffalo and used the flesh, skin and bones of the beast.

In the 19th century, buffaloes were hunted almost to extinction. In the 1880s, only a few hundred magnificent creatures survived.

The main reason for the extermination of the huge herds was the profitable harvest of buffalo hides. There has been a lucrative export of buffalo hides to Europe to produce the luxurious rugs and robes so coveted by the wealthy elite. Hunting buffalo in the Old West was very often a huge commercial endeavor, involving organized teams of professional hunters, supported by a team of leathermen, gun cleaners, gun loaders, camp cooks, adventurers, blacksmiths, delivery drivers and numerous horses, mules and carts. The men were even hired to recover and rework lead bullets taken from heaps of intestines.

From 1873 to 1883, more than a thousand of these professional hunting companies operated in the United States. History says that between 50,000 and 100,000 buffaloes were killed daily, depending on the season. The buffalo hunters left behind a corpse that slowly disintegrated into gigantic piles of buffalo bones, making the prairie so white that some said it looked as if it was covered with snow even in the summer months. After the corpse decomposed, the bones of the buffaloes were harvested and shipped back east.

Many of these professional hunters, such as Buffalo Bill Cody, have killed hundreds of animals in one position and many thousands in their careers. A proud professional hunter massacred over 20,000 according to his own count. Average leather quality could fetch $ 3, and the highest (heavy winter jacket) could be sold for $ 50 in an era when a worker would be lucky enough to earn a dollar a day. Greed is a great motivator. Many people condemned the slaughter, but few did anything actively to stop the slaughter.

The extermination of the American buffalo was part of a diabolical plot by the United States government to control the American Indian population. There have been government initiatives, both at the local and federal level, to starve the Indian population of the plains by eliminating their primary food source, the buffaloes. The herds were the basis of the survival of the tribes of the plains. Without the buffaloes to feed and dress them, the Indians would have been forced to go away or starve to death.

Since the survival of the Indians relied so much on the buffalo, their religions centered around the buffalo. The mutual relationship between the Indians and the buffaloes is illustrated by the poetic words of John Fire Lame Deer:

“The buffalo gave us everything we needed. We were nothing without him. Our teepees were made of his skin. His skin was our bed, our blanket, our winter coat. It was our drum, pulsating at night, alive, holy. We made our water bags out of his skin. His body strengthened us, he became the body of our body. Not even the smallest part was wasted. His stomach, thrown into it red-hot stone, became our soup cauldron. His horns were our spoons, our bones, our knives, our female awls and needles. We made our bowstrings and threads from his tendons. His ribs were shaped like sleds for our children, his hooves became rattles. His mighty skull, leaning against the pipe, was our sacred altar. The biggest Sioux of all was called Tatanka Iyotake – Sitting Bull. When you killed the buffalo, you also killed an Indian – a real, natural, “wild” Indian.

The government also actively encouraged buffalo hunting for other reasons. The reduction in the buffalo population has allowed breeders to raise cattle without competition from other cattle. The railroad industry also wanted buffalo herds to be slaughtered or eliminated. Buffalo herds on railroad tracks can damage or derail locomotives if trains fail to stop in time. During winter storms, mass herds often took refuge in artificial cuts created by the slope of tracks winding through the prairies and hills. As a result, buffalo herds can delay a train’s run by several days and the delays are costly.

In 1884, the American bison was close to extinction and proposals were made to protect the bison. Recognizing that the pressure on the species was too great, Cody was one of the most vocal supporters of measures to save the disappearing buffalo population.

In South Dakota, the herd of James “Scotty” Phillips was one of the first buffalo reintroductions into North America. In 1899, Phillips set out to protect the species from extinction and purchased a small herd from Doug Carlin. Carlin’s son, Fred, tied five calves with a rope during the last great buffalo hunt on the Grand River in 1881 and transported them to the family ranch on the Cheyenne River. At the time of purchase in the US, there were approximately 7 pure buffalo left.

At the time of his death in 1911, at the age of 53, Phillips had expanded the herd to about 1,000 to 1,200. Several other herds also arose from the 5 calves rescued in Grand River.

At the same time, two Montana farmers, Charles Allard and Michel Pablo, invested over 20 years in amassing one of the largest collections of purebred bison on the continent. At the time of Allard’s death in 1896, the herd numbered 300. In 1907, after the US government refused to purchase a herd of bison, Pablo made an agreement with the Canadian government to ship most of his herd north to the newly built E?k. Islands National Park.

The current US bison population has recovered sharply and is estimated at 350,000, compared with 75 to 100 million in the mid-nineteenth century. However, most of the current herds are genetically contaminated or partially crossed with cattle. Currently there are only four genetically unmixed and only one brucellia free herds; is located in South Dakota’s Wind Cave National Park. A founding population of 16 of the Wind Cave herd was recently established in Montana by the American Prairie Association.

The only permanently wild herd of buffaloes in America is located in Yellowstone National Park. The herd of approximately 3,500 is a direct descendant of the 23 buffaloes that survived mass extermination in the 19th century, hiding in the Pelican Valley of Yellowstone Park.

Yellowstone Park’s buffaloes descended from time to time to the lower elevations outside the park in search of winter forage. The presence of wild buffaloes outside the park is viewed as a threat by many cattle farmers who fear that a small percentage of brucellosis-bearing bison will contaminate their livestock and cause their cows to be miscarried. However, there has never been any documented transmission of brucellosis to cattle from wild bison. The controversy that began in the early 1980s continues to this day. Advocacy groups say the Yellowstone stock should be protected as a separate segment of the population under the Endangered Species Act.

In Montana, where public herds require slaughter to control the target bison population, hunting resumed in 2005.

Buffaloes live in the wild for 15 to 20 years, although life expectancy depends on local predators, hunting pressures, and natural disasters. It is known that wisents live in captivity for up to 40 years.

The bison remains an icon of American culture, but our treatment of this majestic animal so far is disgraceful. We hope to carefully consider how to ensure an ecological future for buffaloes and all the wild creatures that still inhabit our precious planet.

[ad_2]

Source by Marlene Affeld

Eco-friendly kitchen appliances – make your kitchen more earth-friendly

[ad_1]

DOE and EPA use the Energy Star program to promote the sale of eco-friendly kitchen appliances. Most of us have seen yellow stickers with the energy star logo, but do you know what these stickers mean? To qualify as Energy Star, a device must use 10% to 66% less energy and / or water than other models. However, this cannot degrade the quality of the device or discard the added features. This is one of the best ways to find out about the greenest appliances that consume the least energy. Here are a few more tips for what to look for in your devices:

Ovens and ovens

Induction – A cast iron or stainless steel pot is placed above the induction coil of the stove. This stimulates the molecules in the dish and generates heat. Note: The process does not work with glass pots and aluminum reduces efficiency. Induction cooking is not only more energy efficient, but also faster. The induction cooker heats the pot only directly above it. It does not heat the air or the surfaces around it. Induction cooking has an efficiency rate of 84%. Typical gas stoves are around 40%. This is one of my favorite ecological kitchen appliances.

Hybrid Solar Ovens- Solar ovens reach a temperature of around 400 degrees. Complete solar furnaces do not require any electricity. They rely solely on solar solar energy. The hybrid version works on the same principle, but has a back-up electricity supply when there is no possibility of using solar energy.

Fridge and freezer

Side by side refrigerators consume around 10% more energy than the top and bottom options. Avoid ice makers as they use electricity to make ice. Also, avoid automatic defrosters and heaters. The refrigerator accounts for approximately 15% of the total electricity bill. So, if you can’t buy all of your eco-friendly kitchen appliances at once, buy the former. Read the yellow and black “energy guide label”. It will tell you how much energy each brand and model consumes.

Dishwasher

Dishwashers use about a sixth of the water and soap and about half the energy of washing by hand. Look for a dishwasher with a booster heater and electric dryer on / off function. You may think that a smaller motor will reduce energy consumption, but using a larger motor will prevent your dishwasher from running a second cycle. Smaller motors do not have the power to spray for cleaning heavily soiled dishes. Also look for water-saving models. Some of them use half the water of a regular dishwasher and have automatic sensors that determine the degree of soiling of the dishes.

Remember – the price of eco-friendly kitchen appliances may be higher, but it will not take long to pay for the extra cost of the appliance. In 2006, Energy Star appliances saved consumers fourteen billion dollars in utility bills. Energy guide labels are required on all devices. So use the information and compare several brands and models. Also inquire about federal tax credits for retrofitting Energy Star appliances.

[ad_2]

Source by Wendy Pan

Stay safe, stay green, stay clean

[ad_1]

According to a 15-year study presented at the Toronto Indoor Air Conference, women working from home have a 54% higher death rate from cancer than those who work outside the home. The study found that this was a direct result of increased exposure to toxic chemicals, many of which are found in common household products. Of the 75,000 chemicals registered, only a fraction has been tested for human health. Moreover, more than 9 out of 10 suspected poison exposures occur in a home with household products.

We believe that your home should be the safest place in the world.

Here are some of the harmful and toxic chemicals lurking under the sink and in the laundry room. All-round cleaners: Many popular household cleaners, such as Fantastik and Formula 409, contain a synthetic solvent and a spreading knife called butyl cellosolve. This dangerous petroleum-based chemical contains neurotoxins and can irritate the skin and eyes. In addition, repeated exposure to it can cause permanent damage to the liver and kidneys and impair the body’s ability to replenish its blood supply. Many universal cleaners can also contain synthetic solvents that can cause hormonal disruptions. Since butyl cellosolve are neurotoxins and nose irritants, another toxin, morpholine, can cause liver or kidney damage.

Bathroom cleaners: Traditional cleaners such as Ajax and Comet contain crystalline silica, which is irritating to the eyes, skin, and lungs, classified by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences as “reasonably predicted as a human carcinogen.”

Some bath, tile, and sink cleaners may contain chlorine and may contribute to the formation of organochlorine, a dangerous class of compounds that can disrupt the reproductive, endocrine, and immune systems. Some may also contain phosphoric acid, which in high concentrations is corrosive and irritates the eyes, skin and respiratory tract.

Window cleaners: Window cleaning sprays such as Windex and Glass Plus contain ammonia, a suffocating gas that irritates the eyes and respiratory tract. Many of them, such as Windex and Glass Plus, contain butyl cellosolve, a neurotoxin that is easily absorbed through the skin.

Laundry Detergent: Most known powders, such as Tide, All, Gain & Dash, contain caustic substances that can burn your eyes and skin. Other chemicals include sodium bisulfate (a corrosive which can cause severe irritation to the eyes, skin and respiratory tract), ethoxylated alcohols (which may contain 1,4-dioxane and “reasonably predicted to be a human carcinogen”).

Many washing powders also contain irritants that can be absorbed through the skin or inhaled, which are a common cause of allergic reactions. Triethanolamine dodecylbenzene sulfonate is such an irritant and is on the EPA and DOT list of hazardous substances. Contact can irritate and burn the skin and eyes, breathing can irritate the nose, throat and lungs causing coughing, wheezing and / or shortness of breath. Repeated skin contact may cause dryness, itching, chronic irritation and rash.

Automatic Dishwashing Detergent: Two of the best-selling automatic dishwashing detergent brands, Cascade and Sun Light, contain phosphates and chlorine, two extremely toxic chemicals. Chlorine vapors are released in the vapor that leaks from the dishwasher and is severely irritating to the eyes, throat and respiratory tract. Breathing them in can cause headaches, burning eyes, and difficulty breathing. Released phosphates into the environment deprive lakes and ponds of oxygen, leading to the suffocation of plants and aquatic animals and the formation of algae.

So, if you want a safe, non-toxic home, look for natural alternatives that are just as effective as their toxic counterparts.

Copyright (c) 2008 Shelby Steinborn

[ad_2]

Source by Shelby Steinborn

Introduction to paper recycling

[ad_1]

For those looking to reduce the waste stream, recycling paper is an excellent way to do it. Especially since paper is wasted in large amounts all year round. The process involves the recovery of a large amount of paper fibers that can be reused and transformed into cardboard, new paper or various paper articles. It’s true that recycling paper isn’t as effective as recycling metal or glass, but it’s a great way to protect the environment and conserve resources.

By choosing to recycle paper, you manage to reduce the amount of waste or water, energy, trees and the amount of pollutants emitted by plants that are converted into paper. Research shows that recycled paper can be 40% more effective than construction paper from nothing in an environmentally friendly way. Those who wish to recycle in an environmentally friendly way can use non-toxic bleaching elements, alternative energy and reclaimed water to recycle the paper (not fresh water).

The consumer is the one who starts recycling. It sorts paper types into recycling bins. All paper is recyclable, and then specialized companies choose glossy, matte or colored paper and cardboard. In the event that they are unable to process a type of product made of paper, these companies sell these products to companies that have the ability to do so. In a recycling facility, the paper is divided into staples, types, paper clips, etc., eliminating contamination.

The next step is to crush the paper and mix it with water. This combination is similar to mulch, which is processed by soaking and mixing. The pulp is then used to make new paper, paper screens, cardboard or paper insulation. If required by the process, the pulp can be whitened before it is formed into new paper. If not, the pulp may retain its natural state.

In rare cases, paper is completely recycled, and this is because existing fibers shorten during processing. It must be combined with the original pulp to obtain a strong and durable paper. In addition, most paper is extremely recyclable: before it runs out, paper can be recycled 4-6 times. In this case, the fibers that shorten are eliminated because they cannot be used. Recycled paper contains labels that indicate the percentage of the content to help the consumer.

The waste that remains from the recycled paper includes fibers that can no longer be used, inks or various contaminants. All of this is known as sludge, which in some cases is buried in landfills. Usually it is spread over the fields as mulch or otherwise it is incinerated to give energy to the paper company. Even though some might say that the incineration sludge is contaminating, in some situations doing so is an environmentally friendly way to fuel a paper manufacturing company. Not to mention, if the sludge is used efficiently, producers can reduce the degree of contamination.

[ad_2]

Source by Karina Popa