Tag: report

Report: EPA cut corners on climate finding

Posted on by gogreen

The Federal government scrimp if this created a vital scientific document underpinning its decision to manage climate-altering pollution, an interior government watchdog stated Wednesday.

The inspector general’s report states the Environment Protection Agency must have adopted a far more robust review process for any technical paper supporting its determination that green house gases posed dangers to human health insurance and welfare, a discovering that ultimately compelled it to problem pricey and questionable rules to manage green house gases the very first time.

The Environmental protection agency and Whitened House could not agree using the report’s conclusions. They stated the green house gas document didn’t require more independent scrutiny since the scientific evidence it took it’s origin from already have been completely examined.

“The report importantly doesn’t question as well as address the science used or even the conclusions arrived at,” the Environmental protection agency stated inside a statement. The environment agency stated its work had “adopted all appropriate guidance.”

The green house gas decision – which marked a reversal in the Rose bush administration – was introduced in December 2009, per week before Leader Obama headed to worldwide discussions in Denmark on the new treaty to curb climatic change. At that time, progress was delayed inside a Democrat-controlled Congress on the new law to lessen pollutants within the U . s . States.

The IG report doesn’t challenge the scientific consensus around what causes climatic change. This Year, market research in excess of 1,000 from the world’s most reported and released climate researchers discovered that 97 percent believe global warming is extremely likely triggered through the burning of non-renewable fuels.

But by highlighting what it really calls “procedural diversions,” the report provides ammunition to Republicans and industry lawyers fighting the Federal government over its decision to make use of the 40-year-old Climate Act to battle climatic change. As the Top Court stated in 2007 the act could be employed to control green house gases, following the Rose bush administration frequently stated it could not, the Republican-controlled House has transpired legislation to alter that.

The balance has to date been stymied through the Democrat-controlled Senate.

Sen. James Inhofe, the Oklahoma Republican who asked for the inspector general’s analysis and something of Congress’ most vocal climate doubters, stated Wednesday the report verifies that “the first step toward Leader Obama’s job-wrecking agenda was rushed, biased and problematic.”

Environmentalists, meanwhile, stated Wednesday the inspector general was nitpicking in the public’s expense. The analysis cost nearly $300,000.

“The procedure matters, however the science matters more,” stated Francesca Grifo, a senior researcher using the Union of Concerned Researchers. “Nothing within this report questions the agency’s capability to proceed with climatic change pollutants rules.”

A prominent environment attorney and Columbia College law professor also asked what effect, if any, the report might have on climatic change policy.

Michael Gerrard stated that although lawyers and political figures would use the are accountable to fight Environmental protection agency rules, the scientific situation for climatic change only has become more powerful.

The report itself discovered that Environmental protection agency “generally” stuck to data quality needs. However it stated as the agency’s document took it’s origin from well-established and peer-examined science, it needed additional independent scrutiny since the agency needed to weigh the effectiveness of that science. The inspector general particularly stated the Environmental protection agency didn’t openly report the outcomes from the review, and something of the dozen pros who examined the document labored in the agency.

The Federal government makes a large deal about the significance of peer review.

Six days after taking office last year, Obama released a memo nevertheless: “When scientific or technological details are considered in policy choices, the data ought to be susceptible to well-established scientific processes, including peer review where appropriate, and every agency should properly and precisely reflect that information in submission with and using relevant legal standards.”

New report: San Francisco Bay getting healthier, not in the clear yet

Posted on by gogreen

Just like a patient from intensive care but still suffering aches, pains and also the need for a number of rehab, Bay Area Bay is around the mend but not even close to taking pleasure in a clean bill of health.

This is the conclusion of the new report launched Monday with a team of researchers studying Northern California’s signature natural feature along with a wide range of their issues — from esturine habitat to wildlife, toxic pollution to trail access.

“The bay’s health is certainly improving. We are making progress,” stated Andrew Gunther, an environment researcher and chief author from the “The Condition of Bay Area Bay 2011.” “But we still have the means to go. Beginning using the Gold Hurry, we’d a hundred years of degrading the bay. And we have only been rebuilding it because the early seventies.”

The report arrives every 2 yrs prior to the biennial Condition from the Estuary Conference, a scientific and public policy meeting that begins Tuesday in the downtown Concord Marriott.

Among its key findings this season: The bay is way less polluted now compared to the nineteen fifties and sixties. After Congress passed the Water That Is Clean Act in 1972, vast amounts of dollars were spent, and continue being spent, improving the sewage treatment plants that filter the wastewater of seven million San Francisco Bay Area citizens and release it in to the bay. Today’s technology removes as much as 99 % from the contaminants for the reason that wastewater. Meanwhile, toxic substances like DDT and PCBs happen to be banned, no significant filling from the

bay has happened in decades, and previously 2 yrs condition government bodies have enforced strict new rules needing San Francisco Bay Area metropolitan areas to significantly reduce the quantity of trash that flows lower storm drains and streams into bay waters.

Wetland restoration is also a significant vibrant place. Previously decade, roughly 10,000 acres of esturine habitat happen to be restored, a lot of it in the former Cargill salt ponds within the South Bay. The bay has roughly 50,000 acres of tidal marsh, up from about 40,000 in 1999, and scientists will work toward a lengthy-term goal of 100,000 acres. Most encouraging, biologists are already seeing increases in wild birds, and a multitude of seafood, from anchovies to leopard sharks, are arriving within the recently restored esturine habitat.

But you will find still major problems.

One of the top problems, based on the report, may be the ongoing diversion of freshwater that will have naturally ran in to the bay. Large dams and pumps that move vast amounts of gallons of water in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to farms and metropolitan areas have cut freshwater flows in to the bay by 50 %. Which has permitted salty water in the sea to push farther eastward underneath the Golden Gate, in significant levels up so far as Contra Costa County.

That change, which faster previously decade, continues to be associated with crashes seafood populations, stated biologist Christina Swanson, among the report’s authors.

“Within the last several decades, the bay continues to be in a condition of chronic drought,” Swanson stated. “Safeguarding the bay’s ecosystem and recuperating its fisheries will need alterations in water management within the bay’s tributary rivers and also the Delta to improve freshwater flows, particularly throughout the spring.”

In comparison towards the eighties, the abundance of pelagic, or open water, fishes previously 5 years was 88 percent reduced Suisun Bay, 68 percent reduced San Pablo Bay, and 55 percent reduced South Bay, the report noted. That information originates from monthly seafood surveys completed in 35 locations round the bay by condition Seafood and Game biologists who’ve used nets to trap and measure seafood regularly since 1980.

Other challenges include invasive species, such as the overbite clam, which crowd out native species. Harder rules needing ships to empty their ballast water outdoors the Golden Gate make a positive change, however the bay continues to have a lot more than 200 nonnative species that oftentimes have pressed out or reduced natives.

And you will find legacy contaminants remaining in the Gold Hurry like mercury, which still washes lower from closed mines in Santa Clara County and also the Sierra Nevada. The bay is gradually eliminating more mercury to the sea than is defined in, but it will require decades before all seafood within the bay are secure to consume, particularly for ladies of childbearing age.

The report, which is published at world wide web.sfestuary.org, was made by the Bay Area Estuary Partnership, a course from the Association of San Francisco Bay Area Government authorities that’s funded through the U.S. Environment Protection Agency and also the condition of California.

One major challenge, as condition and federal agencies proceed with rebuilding 15,100 acres of former Cargill salt ponds, is funding. With budgets tight, future progress might be slow happening that actually work, as well as on efforts to grow the Bay Trail, 310 miles which is finished toward a 500-mile goal.

Fish often mislabeled, report finds

Posted on by gogreen

There’s something ambiguous about seafood, an all-embracing ocean advancement accumulation contends in “Bait and Switch,” a afresh appear address on seafood fraud. According to Oceana, in Washington, D.C., seafood is generally mislabeled in restaurants and at stores. Packaging and processing may aswell belittle the bulk of breading and ice in arctic angle products.

Citing DNA tests of 1,000 angle filet samples from dozens of U.S. cities over the accomplished four years, the address said that alone 50 percent of the angle activated were the breed listed on the label. Angle labeled as red snapper, agrarian apricot and Atlantic cod are in fact added angle 25 percent to 70 percent of the time, the address said, with rockfish and tilapia generally commissioned for snapper, farmed apricot for agrarian and pollock for Atlantic cod.

“Species barter is a way actionable angle can be apple-pie into the seafood market,” said Michael Hirshfield, Oceana’s arch scientist. “Species barter not alone undermines acknowledged fishermen and acknowledged fishing by acceptance actionable fishing to flourish, but it aswell undermines consumer-driven efforts to do the appropriate affair and ask for breed that are responsibly managed.”

Eighty-four percent of seafood eaten in the U.S. is imported, but alone 2 percent is inspected, the address said. Hirshfield said the best way to ensure angle is acknowledged and accurately labeled would be with a civic tracking database application bar codes, agnate to the way Amazon advance its

packages.

“There should be no botheration in tracking angle aback to a accurate barge that bent the angle at a accurate time in a accurate abode in a accurate way,” Hirshfield said.

A agent for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said the bureau is borderline how generally angle barter occurs. “When we acquisition it, we act on it,” said the FDA’s Douglas Karas, citation cases in 2010 and 2009 in which companies had been bent mislabeling branch as red snapper and arctic bedrock sole as grouper fish.

“Our affairs are to conduct an all-embracing collaborative balloon of the (DNA bar-coding) adjustment in hopes of accepting all-embracing accreditation,” Karas said. The FDA urges consumers to beware of almighty low prices for fish.